About Me

Name: Vansword
Email: vansword2006@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Conservatism's Surge A True Change To Believe In

Last night's Republican rout in Virginia was a statement on President Obama no matter what Press Secretary Robert Gibbs tells us. The excuse that Virginia has always voted for the out-of-power-party in off year elections doesn't change the fact that the margin of swing in their vote since 2008 is astounding.  The same voters that put Barack Obama in the White House went for Bob McDonnell-northern Virginia which is practically a White House lawn ornament declared its independence from the D.C.machine on Tuesday.
 
The success of Chris Christie's New Jersey gubernatorial campaign is another loud and clear proclamation. New Jersey citizens are sick and tired of the corruption and stratospheric taxes-their decision to place their state in the hands of a man who is bent on cleaning up the Garden State bodes well for Americans demanding the same of their politicians in Washington.
 
It wasn't a lack of motivation and drive in candidate Doug Hoffman that cost Republicans the election in NY-23. His loss to the Democrat challenger, Bill Owens, says more about the Republican party's candidate selection process in the state of New York and the party's current divide than about Hoffman's ability to win. The Republican Congressional Conference didn't do themselves any favors when it convinced Scuzzyface....um, er...Dede.... to endorse the Democrat challenger.
  
Hoffman may not be the most personable, charismatic man; but many of the residents of that district were sympathetic with his values and appreciative of his practical approach to the problems they face. Coming from out of nowhere a few short months ago to make as big a splash as he did on both the local and national scene is indicative of the strength of the grassroots movement he represents.
 
There is more to celebrate from Tuesday's off-year election results than the capturing of two important governors' races. State referendums dealing with two explosive political issues were on the ballots in Maine and Texas. Maine voters overturned the previous legislative decision allowing gay marriage. It was a major conservative victory in that the Democrat governor had thrown his whole weight behind the new gay marriage law and state liberals thought it was going to be a law written in stone.
 
Though I am a conservative on fiscal policy, the scope of government and constitutional law, I am not what you would term a social conservative. The matters of abortion and gay marriage are not the uppermost on my agenda. However, I am currently an advocate for each and every conservative play that reeks havoc on the liberal power base in Washington. If that appears rather Machevellian to some, then I sincerely apologize.
 
But if we aren't practical and willing to come together with our varying ideologies to keep from losing our Republic's timeless principles to a bunch of liberals for whom causes are mere playthings on the road to power than we will have more to worry about than abortion and gay marriage rights. Above all, we must preserve the authenticity of these United States, that nation brilliantly designed and bequeathed to us more than two hundred years ago.
 
Leave it to Texas to seize the day and keep blazing that trail to true liberty and independence. Voters passed Proposition 11, allowing for a state constitutional amendment which "limits the use of eminent domain for public use and specifically defines "public use" to specifically not include "the taking of private property for...transfer to a private entity for the purpose of economic development or enhancement of tax revenue purposes." The amendment won't totally solve the eminent domain issue-there are still loopholes to close but it is a great beginning in dealing with government overreach. Can I hear a collective hurrah?
 
The other forty-nine need to look, listen and learn. Texas leaders' utter fearlessness in the face of government threats and attempted domination is beyond admirable. Sure, they may have more guts than cattle but then it's a question of what is worse: their condition or the problem other states have, which is, they're all hat and NO cattle! Texans believe wholeheartedly in those founding principles Washington. We need to hear that same dedication to the great cause of the United States of America from her sister states!
 
Those who voted for Barack Obama in the last presidential election succombed to his charming mantra, "Change we can believe in".  We have not had any change we can believe in. But his administration has demanded time and again in the short span of one year that we Americans change WHAT we believe in! And what we believe in is liberty and justice for all, just like it says in the Pledge of Allegiance.
 
Time to ante up state legislators. The stakes are high and now, now is the time to go out on the limb and demand your states' inherent right to govern themselves with as little federal government interference as possible. The conservative movement is on the rise and states are the ones who should be leading the charge!

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Frankenstein Commission

In Mary Shelley's famous novel, Dr. Frankenstein would have everyone believe that he created his monster for the betterment of mankind through science. In the end, it was obvious a desire to play God was the real reason.
 
There are many monsters running loose in the United States Congress. These legislative monsters were created years ago by that same kind of thinking-the liberal progessive philosophy which believes it knows what is best for all of humanity but really seeks the power of a mad scientist over his experiment. This ultra-liberalism has been lying not-so-patiently in wait for the perfect political moment.
 
That moment arrived with the Presidential election of 2008. Unlike the villagers in Shelley's novel, we don't need torches to locate this beast-we know where he lies. We must corner and cage him before he destroys us all.
 
The monster I refer to is the censorship of free speech being promoted by The Franking Commission, the bipartisan group responsible for mandating Congressional mailing standards. This commission, unfamiliar to many Americans, oversees and monitors the contents of all franked(free) mail sent out by Representatives and Senators to their constitutents. Such mail involves flyers and letters that offer voters brief summaries of their elected officials activities and news/opinions on certain vital issues.
 
Recently, the usually rather low-key panel decided it was time to clamp down on Congress' outgoing mail. Republican House member John Carter from Texas was told he could not use the phrase 'government-run healthcare' in a letter to his constitutents penned by his staff.
He was told he would have to change the wording- they even offered their ideas of  what they termed 'more suitable' language.
Rep. Carter revealed this email from the Commission at a press conference last Thursday.
 
At that same press conference, Carter posed this question, "Now, why can't I say what I feel about a plan that I'm being asked to vote upon, that has been debated on the floor of the House on multiple occasions, where multiple numbers of people have used the tern 'government-run healthcare' plan?"
 
"Why does The Franking Commission have the right to prevent me from freely speaking what I think my folks back home ought to hear and instead tell me I have to speak what the President said last night?" Carter asked. "I think that is an abridgment of free speech."
 
The Texas Congressman went on, "Why are they so afraid of this chart? He was referring to the very colorful, very intricate chart on Obama's health care plan introduced by his fellow Texan, Rep. Kevin Brady, which was, ironically, voted into the Congressional record on the House floor earlier in the month but disallowed by the Franking Commission.  Carter asked, "Could it be that they know what this health care plan is?"
 
If it's good enough for the permanent record of legislative proceedings it's good enough for the American public. That's part of the problem. As Americans, we don't know enough of what goes on in the Capitol building. I personally believe that everything they discuss and write should be made a matter of public record, available to those who put them in office.
 
John Carter's communications director, John Stone told one news network that Republicans plan to fight this obvious censorship from The Franking Commission. "We plan to take it to the floor on Monday night", he said. "If they try to stop it with a motion to adjourn we're going to go outside and hold our speeches. We will not be silenced."
 
This is how it starts my fellow citizens- one governing arm telling another arm what they can and cannot say to their own voters? I know it's not smart to talk about individual Congressman paying for their own mass mailings in these tough economic times, but that would definitely be one way around the Franking Commission!
 
I don't know exactly how that would work or how Congressman would raise the funds to pay for their own constituency mailings. Perhaps everyone who votes for Congress could be able to donate toward the chance to have uncensored mail from their elected officials.
We could find a way to circumvent this strangulation of legislators' freedom of speech. Listen, if our 'fearless leader' can get around the Constitution, certainly our Representatives and Senators can get around one little commission! But any of those ways would be admitting that the Commission has the right to censor in the first place.
 
What we need to do is clobber this hideous monster with the torches we carry- that torch being our love of personal freedom. It is inherent in man and not subject to the control of any mad scientist or liberal progressive philosophy. It's time to run through the village with torches burning brightly-we are not afraid of monsters, under the bed or in the Congress!
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Say Anything As Long As I Agree With You

We've heard the liberal Dems ask in voices dripping with phony, heartfelt indignation- how can Conservatives complain about taxes at tea parties and post so many anti-Obama blogs? We're in a crisis situation- we're all in this together, they want to point out. We're all Americans, in the same economic boat, they say.  They tell us we need to stop complaining and be willing to make sacrifices as a country(read.....suffer higher taxes to join other nations in promulgating the notion of global warming).  They insist that we have to come together to survive this crisis and make America stronger.
 
The Dems tell us we are paranoid, they reassure us that our Bill of Rights is still intact- in their minds we are wasting valuable time whining about things like freedom of speech. They think we are the problem! They think we need to get onboard with all of their stupid ideas and bad legislation just to keep the peace! Keep the peace and lose our freedoms!  They really must think we're a bunch of uneducated idiots!  They think we're not paying attention. We won't notice that their notion of freedom of speech only applies to those with their ideology!
 
When we notice any First Amendment infraction or the threat of such an infraction, liberals go on the offensive with name-calling and fear mongering. They have to call us domestic terrorists and extremists because they cannot go on the defensive. They know in their hearts that there is no defense for trying to quell freedom of speech. If they focus the attention on domestic terrorists, striking a patriotic pose where they appear to honestly care about this country, then surely no one will notice what's going on. FYI, all you liberals, from mayors' houses to the White House-we are noticing-and keeping track of the instances we hear about where the First Amendment has been flagrantly ignored or called into question. I've put together this list of First Amendment problems which I've run across in the past six months:
 
*During the Atlanta Tax Day Tea Party on April 15, 2009, Atlanta police demanded that tea party protestors hand over the sticks from the backs of their signs because they represented 'possible weapons". One woman was even forced to hand over the metal pole holding up her American flag for the same reason. These were ordinary citizens-not ex-cons or rowdy kids. They were simply exercising their right to gather in the public to air their grievances. They should be able to do so without undue harrassment from law enforcement!
 
*This past April, students at a UNC-Chapel Hill seminar stormed the stage where Colorado Congressmen, Tom Tancredo. was giving a speech against illegal immigration. Police had to use pepper spray to subdue the protestors- angry students who thought they could use force against someone whose views differed from their own.
 
*Las Vegas, Nevada tea party organizers had to call their rally "picnic in the park' in order to obtain the required permit for public assembly. They were also slapped with a 1000 fee for the permit which a generous, sympathetic private citizen paid from his own pocket. Sounds like the city government of Las Vegas, with a financual roadblock and silly rules, was trying to make it a chore to get permission to have a tea party to protest the government.
 
*The Office of Homeland Security, under Janet Napalitano, is trying to discourage dissenting opinion and public rallies by calling their participants extremists and domestic terrorists. This kind of intimidation from our government against its citizens because they dare to be vocal with their opinions is too blatant to be believed! 
 
*During the height of the bank bailouts a few months ago, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry of Mass. suggested that the Senate set up a committee to help newspapers in danger of insolvency. Though he might have truly been thinking of helping out the press, which is an important part of our free republic, there is a problem with the idea: newspapers who receive a government bailout,by law, cannot endorse political candidates. Freedom of speech? Not so much!
 
*These same freedom of speech rights belong to those with liberal, non-conservative opinions as well! Richard Mullen, a middle school teacher from Brookeland Texas, who is an atheist and political liberal, is being railroaded by staunchly conservative school board members who all belong to the same church-a church whose pastor has publicly stated that there should only be Christian teachers in their public schools! If the school was private, they would be well within their rights to form school policy and create a religious learning institution. But, because we have a long-standing tradition of separating church and state, they are not within their rights to limit Mr. Mullen's freedom to express opinions vastly different from theirs in a government-funded school.
 
*Debbie McLucas, a hospital supervisor from Mansfield, Texas was told that a U.S. flag she had placed in her office was offensive to other workers, especially a woman from Africa who has only been in this country for 14 years. This woman took down McLucas' flag while McLucas was away. Her boss told her that the flag outside the building would have to be enough for her. McLucas was merely displaying her love and patriotism for her country-her homeland! Her husband and sons were once in the military and her daughter is currently serving in Iraq.
 
That last story had a happy ending because the story spread quickly across the Web and the hospital was inundated with phone callers expressing support for McLucas's right to have her flag. The hospital quickly reversed their decision and McLucas triumphed. Many voices for the cause of personal freedom and liberty do make a difference. We can't let any of these instances where people have been threatened and punished for having the nerve to speak up go unnoticed.
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Power to the Fifty

Gun ownership border restrictions, education reform-these issues among many others, can best be resolved with two words, states' rights. Maybe my stance on the importance of the rights of individual states is partly due to my upbringing in a place where that concept is drilled into your head along with the multiplication tables. In South Carolina, John C Calhoun, Vice-President under Thomas Jefferson, was more than an admirable statesman- he was a hero.
 
But the main reason I wholeheartedly espouse the idea of states' rights is the United States Constitution. States' rights were built into the Constitution by its framers at its inception. In the Tenth Amendment, the Constitution sets forth explicitly, in unarguable language, where the rights of the citizens and states begin and the obligations of the federal government end.
 
To paraphrase an old Lorrie Morgan song, I would like to ask the current crop of Congressional seat holders, Cabinet cronies and high court lifers, "What part of the Tenth Amendment don't you understand?! It might also be worth asking how long it's been since they've read that part of the Constitution-or any of the Constitution, for that matter. It's a fair question since most of them admit to not having read the stimulus bill before it quickly passed in February.
 
Could it possibly be any clearer? The Tenth reads,"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The problem, of course, is that more than a hundred years, the Federal government has taken more and more liberty with the Constitution-many politicians today seem to see it as more of a flexiblee guideline instead of the rule of law that was meant to govern this country.
 
This usurpation of power by the federal government has been so slow and gradual and its real purpose so covered in the powdered sugar of benevolence that Americans have swallowed it whole. It doesn't help that a large number of Americans haven't themselves read the Constitution. What would help our citizenry awaken to what their government is doing would be a massive campaign to put a copy of the Constitution into everyone's hands. Some of you might remember the days when civics and government was a required course for high school graduation.
 
In the last few months, there have been movements afoot to recognize and promote states' rights. At least 20 states, including Texas, South Carolina(you know us, never afraid to fire the first shot!), Louisiana, Utah and Montana have adopted resolutions stating their sovereignty
under the Tenth Amendment. Many governors such as Rick Perry of Texas, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Mark Sanford of South Carolina have declared their willingness to fight for the rights given to their states by the United States Constitution.
 
One by one, states are beginning to realize that they can stand up for themselves. In anticipation of the possibility of stricter gun laws under the new administration, Montana passed a law that says if the guns were made in that state, they're the states' business! Georgia Secretary of State, Karen Handel, has a petition circulating to protest the Obama Justice Department's demand that Georgia immediately halt any voter registration requirements.(not hard to see where they're going with this. Let dead people and non-citizens vote to help the Dems) And we all know how passionate Rick Perry of Texas feels on the subject. He was so mad awhile back that he even mentioned the evil S word-yes, secession.
 
New organizations abound across the internet to promote the sovereignty of states. One of them is the Patrik Henry Caucus, whose plans include states descending en masse upon Washington in the event of any court ruling that denies any state their sovereignty.
 
State governments cannot be afraid to let their governors and legislatures be heard. We cannot throw in the towel and let this speedy slide to the left continue unchecked. Wherever gun ownership issues arise, they must be taken through every possible channel; wherever free speech is challenged, there must be such outcries as to embarrass the listeners; wherever our fundamental rights to assemble are threatened with a shutdown there must be even larger rallies.
 
This is still the United States of America-a careful reading of those words says it all. Our Founding Fathers did not envision the federal government we have today. They didn't want a centralized power with a strangle hold on the states and the individual. The Constitution is still in force-for now at least-and we have to show a solidarity the likes of which hasn't been seen since 1776. I am heartened by the vast number of websites and grassroots organizations that have taken hold of the American conscience in the last six months.
 
This is still our country and we the people have an inalienable right to protect its traditions, preserve its promises of freedom and, yes, as Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, if we see tyranny, we have not a right, but a responsibility to rid this country of that tyranny. We cannot be afraid.
 
We can get back our country. Small victories are being won all around this nation every day. You just don't hear about them because the left-loving media keeps them quiet.
 
Americans have turned a blind eye to the actions of politicians for far too long; now, we are paying the price. We are watching an unfolding of the consequences of allowing the federal government to grow to mammoth proportions. As a recent guest on Fox's Glenn Beck show observed, "We created this monster....now it's time to rein him in!"
 
 
 
Copyright
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey,Garafaolo! Listen Up!

I'd like to introduce myself to Janeane Garafaolo. I am a proud, Libertarian/Conservative Southern white woman, born and bred in the great state of South Carolina, college -educated and leading a cosmopolitan lifestyle near Atlanta.  Garafaolo, you need to listen up! You have no business unilaterally labelling all tea party protestors as ignorant, racist rednecks.  I am  neither ignorant nor a racist but I proudly marched around the town square and congregated on the courthouse steps of an historic middle Georgia town on April 15th to protest my indignation at federal government actions and to lend my support to the fight to save the principles of our Founding Fathers.
 
FYI, tea party protestors came from across the board. They ranged from financiers and college professors to blue collar workers(who also have brains), stay at home moms and small entrepreneurs. These were people who have watched our government and come to their own intelligent conclusions. I guess it's just easier for liberals like you to assume that any opinion other than yours must be fueled by stupidity or bias, since, if they were fueled by other well-thought out reasons, then liberals might be....aghast....wrong! You use words like 'teabagging' to keep from actually using rational thought to consider what's happening among Conservatives.
 
As for the racism accusation, you don't need to look far in this country to find many black Conservative voices. In Madison,Georgia I stood alongside fellow Americans who were black and as fed up with the government as I am. My husband who attended a tea party in Sugarland, TX., said that several speakers on those city hall steps were black. Intelligent people come in all colors. 
 
I do not dislike our new President because he is black. Some years ago, I had a great respect for our military commander-in-chief, Gen. Colin Powell who I believed then would have made a good president. Last month, I joined the Intelligent Thinker's Movement, an organization founded by local Atlanta Conservative radio talk show host, Herman Cain, an uber-successful, black businessman whose daily wisdom and insight never fails to amaze and inspire me. I would vote for him for President in a heartbeat! No, I do not dislike our new President because he is a black man. He is just the 'wrong' black man.
 
You said that tax day protestors didn't know what the Boston Tea Party was about. Well, we know-the question is, Do You? It was about more than taxes-it was about ordinary citizens sick up and fed with a huge out-of-control government that threatens our freedoms. Sound familiar?
 
It seems to me that you are the one woefully uneducated. The Tea Party Movement wasn't started by incendiary diatribes from Conservative radio talk show hosts or wholly organized by rightist media or politicians. It is truly a grassroots movement that started with the shared opinions of many Americans that swept through the web and onto the streets. Last Wednesday was not a one-time evening of chest-pounding(as one liberal reporter described it). Websites abound with the same cause-the resurgence of Conservatism in America. More rallies are scheduled for later this year. You want to talk about 'straight up' facts? Well, here's one for you. The tea party protests that occurred on this last April 15th were plain tea, straight up. Now, it's time to add a little flavoring with the continuing fight against a liberal government that seeks to destroy our freedoms and rights.There will be more protests in the coming months to spice up that plain old tea!
 
Your comments seem to suggest another kind of bigotry- partisan bigotry. You think that only liberals know how to save this country. I'm sure I speak for my other tax day tea party protestor brethren when I say, We Don't Want the Kind of Country That You Want to Save!! If I seem to be getting irate this is why: you've heard the expression, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned? Well, an angry, strong, Southern woman, white or black, is much worse. Along with many of our Conservative-minded fellow citizens, we are mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »