About Me

Name: Vansword
Email: vansword2006@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Conservatism's Surge A True Change To Believe In

Last night's Republican rout in Virginia was a statement on President Obama no matter what Press Secretary Robert Gibbs tells us. The excuse that Virginia has always voted for the out-of-power-party in off year elections doesn't change the fact that the margin of swing in their vote since 2008 is astounding.  The same voters that put Barack Obama in the White House went for Bob McDonnell-northern Virginia which is practically a White House lawn ornament declared its independence from the D.C.machine on Tuesday.
 
The success of Chris Christie's New Jersey gubernatorial campaign is another loud and clear proclamation. New Jersey citizens are sick and tired of the corruption and stratospheric taxes-their decision to place their state in the hands of a man who is bent on cleaning up the Garden State bodes well for Americans demanding the same of their politicians in Washington.
 
It wasn't a lack of motivation and drive in candidate Doug Hoffman that cost Republicans the election in NY-23. His loss to the Democrat challenger, Bill Owens, says more about the Republican party's candidate selection process in the state of New York and the party's current divide than about Hoffman's ability to win. The Republican Congressional Conference didn't do themselves any favors when it convinced Scuzzyface....um, er...Dede.... to endorse the Democrat challenger.
  
Hoffman may not be the most personable, charismatic man; but many of the residents of that district were sympathetic with his values and appreciative of his practical approach to the problems they face. Coming from out of nowhere a few short months ago to make as big a splash as he did on both the local and national scene is indicative of the strength of the grassroots movement he represents.
 
There is more to celebrate from Tuesday's off-year election results than the capturing of two important governors' races. State referendums dealing with two explosive political issues were on the ballots in Maine and Texas. Maine voters overturned the previous legislative decision allowing gay marriage. It was a major conservative victory in that the Democrat governor had thrown his whole weight behind the new gay marriage law and state liberals thought it was going to be a law written in stone.
 
Though I am a conservative on fiscal policy, the scope of government and constitutional law, I am not what you would term a social conservative. The matters of abortion and gay marriage are not the uppermost on my agenda. However, I am currently an advocate for each and every conservative play that reeks havoc on the liberal power base in Washington. If that appears rather Machevellian to some, then I sincerely apologize.
 
But if we aren't practical and willing to come together with our varying ideologies to keep from losing our Republic's timeless principles to a bunch of liberals for whom causes are mere playthings on the road to power than we will have more to worry about than abortion and gay marriage rights. Above all, we must preserve the authenticity of these United States, that nation brilliantly designed and bequeathed to us more than two hundred years ago.
 
Leave it to Texas to seize the day and keep blazing that trail to true liberty and independence. Voters passed Proposition 11, allowing for a state constitutional amendment which "limits the use of eminent domain for public use and specifically defines "public use" to specifically not include "the taking of private property for...transfer to a private entity for the purpose of economic development or enhancement of tax revenue purposes." The amendment won't totally solve the eminent domain issue-there are still loopholes to close but it is a great beginning in dealing with government overreach. Can I hear a collective hurrah?
 
The other forty-nine need to look, listen and learn. Texas leaders' utter fearlessness in the face of government threats and attempted domination is beyond admirable. Sure, they may have more guts than cattle but then it's a question of what is worse: their condition or the problem other states have, which is, they're all hat and NO cattle! Texans believe wholeheartedly in those founding principles Washington. We need to hear that same dedication to the great cause of the United States of America from her sister states!
 
Those who voted for Barack Obama in the last presidential election succombed to his charming mantra, "Change we can believe in".  We have not had any change we can believe in. But his administration has demanded time and again in the short span of one year that we Americans change WHAT we believe in! And what we believe in is liberty and justice for all, just like it says in the Pledge of Allegiance.
 
Time to ante up state legislators. The stakes are high and now, now is the time to go out on the limb and demand your states' inherent right to govern themselves with as little federal government interference as possible. The conservative movement is on the rise and states are the ones who should be leading the charge!

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Peace For A New World Order

Star date 2009---The Select Committee of Earth Alliance has awarded the American Sector Commander with its highest honor. The new world order is in full swing.
 
Barack Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize. The reasons are obvious. Rush Limbaugh got it right with his take on the President's landing the coveted distinction: "You're destroying your country. Good job! Keep it up!" The European community is ecstatic at Obama's weakening of America. They admitted as much when they said the prize honors the great things he may accomplish in his presidency. They know where his heart lies-it lies in the same place as theirs.
 
Obama has spent the first nine months of his presidency placating those who either view the United States as a control freak or as an outright enemy. In speech after speech, he's apologized for this country's arrogance. He has reacted to world crises like the Iranian protests with a lukewarm interest that failed to support the idea of democracy. American sovereignty's slide into oblivion continued at the G-20 summit where Obama placated other world leaders with promises of economic policy and action. Russia was able to convince him to cancel the missile defense shield over Poland. And, now there are countries meeting in secret to discuss adopting a monetary unit other than the American dollar as the official oil currency. Those on the march to a new world order appreciated Obama's cooperation!
 
What has Barack Hussein Obama(mmm mmm mmm) done to deserve an award so prestigious? He was only twelve days past his inauguration when he was nominated. Michelle barely had time to rid the White House's private quarters of Laura Bush's scent! Maybe appointing a cast of shadowy characters as White House advisors was inspiring to the Nobel committee. It's interesting to note, too, that before the Peace prize was announced, the President managed to postpone decisions on Afghanistan strategies and possible troop buildup.
 
Imagine what the young men and women fighting in Afghanistan to weed out and destroy the Taliban and Al-Queda are thinking. They suffer tremendour hardship and defeat and they learn that their Commander-in-Chief has been chosen for an award that purports to recognize achievements of peace. As for poor, stressed out Gen. McChrystal, you know he's in a cave somewhere wishing for a really stiff drink!
 
There have been positive comments from liberals and conservatives alike that Obama handled the Nobel news with grace and humility. That humble demeanor was as faux as faux can be! Of course he had to downplay his worthiness and deny his achievements were sufficient(which wasn't much of a stretch). What was he supposed to say? "Yippee, I've won the Peace prize. Now I'm going to Disneyworld?"
 
The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded many times to those whose lives and actions have been truly inspiring-Martin Luther King, Jr., and Mother Theresa among them. But over the last one hundred years, the Oslo selection committee has also singled out what many surely agree are less-than-worthy types-Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore. In 1973 Henry Kissinger shared the prize for his work in ending the Vietnam War but his win was so controversial that two of the committee's members resigned. The list of others nominated and those never given that honor is equally astounding.
 
Ronald Reagan who was instrumental in ending the Cold War and bringing down the Berlin Wall, one of the world's strongest symbols of tyranny, was never included. Winston Churchill was nominated for the Peace prize but won the prize for literature instead. Chinese human rights activist Liu Xiaobo who was persecuted for his staunch resistance and ideologies never won. It took the great humaitiarian Jane Adams twelve successive nominations to finally be awarded the prize. But progessive U.S. president Teddy Roosevelt won on his first try.
 
The most astonishing name missing from the list of winners,however, is probably the 20th century's most ardent proponent of peace, Mohatma Gandhi, who was nominated four times before his assassination,including that year, but because of Nobel rules was ineligible for the award after his death. The committee opted to have no winner that year.
 
Several of those nominated for the award are unbelievable choices- Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin. A nomination can be made by only one individual of if he has some standing in the international community. As is evident, the Nobel Peace Prize has a contradictory past and is continuing this less than fair pattern into the 21st century. This latest choice is more odorous than a plate fill of lutefisk!
 
According to Swedish industrialist and inventor Alfred Nobel's last will and testament, the Peace Prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Barack Obama hasn't had time to do much work at all, let alone the best work for international fraternity. As for the armies clause, well, we are in the middle of a nasty war in Afghanistan that may require a significant increase in troops, not less.
 
The last clause of Nobel's directive for the award named for him is probably our president's best hope for success. He is very adept at promoting and cheering the cause of peace and making speeches. That thought makes ones wonder- if Obama does not live up to the potential the Peace prize celebrates, will he have to give it back?
 
The flecks of honor are flying fast and furious from the Peace Prize medallion's patina. It is a weakened version of whatever honorable institution it was originally intended to be. After all, every Democratic president in the past forty years has won it, except for Bill Clinton, who is probably wishing he had apologized for more than just infidelity!
 
This astonishing turn of events that has Barack Obama the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize recipient is astonishing only to those of us on the outside looking in. The powers that be have started the world on the path to a new world order that Obama can now wear around his neck. Hugo Chavez is down in Venezuela right now clearing out a corner of his safe deposit box for that much-coveted Norwegian coin!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Constitution Week

 
If I hadn't received an email from Georgia gubernatorial candidate, Karen Handel, this morning, I might never have known that we have a week designated by Congress as Constitution Week.(September 17-23). A joint resolution of Congress on August 2, 1956 requested that the President proclaim that week as such.  In 2002, then President George W. Bush reaffirmed this observance of the signing of that document which outlined the unique republic that is America. I guess we can assume from the wording of the Congressional resolution that each new President can proclaim Constitution Week.
 
Do you think Barack Obama will reaffirm its observance? How can we expect that when just today he announced that the U.S. would not be building the missile defense shield in Europe? Our President is not thinking about Americans general welfare and our mutual defense but is instead putting our safety in danger by caving to the demands of Russia!
 
Shouldn't such a Constitution week be more known to its citizens? The answer is a resounding, yes! But a mention of events and philosophies of two hundred years ago receives shrugs and hand-waving dismissals in the face of modern-day political thinking and the bureaucracy of egos that exist in Washington.
 
To you out-of-touch liberals who thought last year's election was an infinite mandate to take the helm of this country and run like drug-crazed hippie dreamers through the halls of Congress, wiping away all the vestiges of 'the man' and the 'establishment' and 'racism', clear the scent of incense from your nostrils and take off your John-Lennon-rose-colored eyeglasses!
 
Middle America is what it has always been-hard working men and women, working on farms, or in factories, trying to raise their children to be decent, law-abiding citizens, trying to stay out of debt and save a pittance for retirement. They relish living in a country where our rights and liberties are supposed to be guaranteed, taken care of in such a way that we don't have to worry about them every day. Instead, we can focus on our own lives! It is the voice of Middle America that you have been hearing over the summer in townhall meetings. It is
their outrage that you have to interrupt their lives with constant worry about the loss of their individual freedom and the republic they love!
 
Your illusion that most of America do or should share your view of the world as one big commune(where we share the wealth and keep our personal opinions of religion and such matters to ourselves for fear of upsetting our fellow dwellers) was, is and will always be just that-an illusion, one inspired and urged onward by a select group of ideological extremist thinkers from the past, who were out of touch with the realities of everyday life.
 
Most of are far too busy worrying about the education of our children and how to pay next month's bills to worry about some left wing activists' cries to put animals and the earth first. My children and grandchildren are first in my line. Raccoons and recycling dont even make it to my top ten!
 
That same Constitution that gives me the freedom to say these things to you also gives you the right to say what you do. The difference between us-the conservative/libertarians/independents and you the progressive liberal is that we recognize that it is against that same Constitution for us to insist that you live according to our precepts. You want to try to use the government power to mandate that I live according to yours.
 
Our liberty is open.  Everyone is free. Free to be a financial success. Or free to be a complete failure. Free to go live on a commune in California. Or free to be a member of a fundamental Christian group. Free to make life decisions based on what you believe, not what the government tells you to believe. 
 
Your idea of liberty is closed -for the expansion and realization of a social and political agenda. You want to tell us that freedom is relative, that we are 'free enough' with the limited liberties you would like to give us You want to tell us that the bigger picture of environmentalism and animals rights are more important than my one and only life! That perspective of liberty exists nowhere in its definition.
 
Let us celebrate our Constitution this week.  It lays out the provisions of our liberty with a marvel of concise language and flexibility. It is our protection. It is our beacon. It is the one truth about America. We love our freedom. We've fought world wars to ensure that freedom. We've aided other countries in their own fight-yes, sometimes, to our detriment and with a failing result, but always with the principles of our ideals forging our way. That is the kind of country we are.
 
Our ideals of freedom will always be at the center of any argument, political or social. There is no partisan strategy or philosophical movement that can erase that. We've had those ideals since the beginning-they were our beginning. They are also our forever. We like them. We believe in them. We're keeping them......and our Constitution. Somebody could tear every known copy of that document into a million shreds...we would gather in our homes and collectively we would write it all over again! We might not get every phrase the same but we know the jist....the spirit and words of the United States Constitution are within us all!
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Random Observations

Same Old Song and Dance------

Over the summer recess, that speaker for fellow grape heiresses everywhere, Nancy Pelosi, decided she didn't like the patriotic on-hold music playing on House phones and had it changed to 'smoothe jazz'. Thanks to an irate letter from a Republican congressman and subsequent public outcry, the music has reverted back to patriotic. Hopefully, Republicans will take back a majority of the Congress next fall and then we can change the music to that Wizard of Oz favorite, "Ding Dong the Witch Is Dead"!
 
 
More Green Propaganda--------
 
There are "I Pledge Allegiance to the Earth" posters on the walls of some elementary schools in America-just more attempts at the environmentalist crazies and the color green-obsessed to get our kids on board their fast train to socialism. Children are very vulnerable and susceptible to ideologies and these lefty liberals know this! By appealing to their innate, youthful desire to get along with everybody and convincing them that bad people are destroying the planet they love , they hope to create legions of little green-obsessed citizens who grow up to care more about trees and animals than they do humanity.  It's these same loons that join PETA and talk about people being the greatest scourge the world has ever known. Our kids are being bombarded by those nuts outside of McDonalds with insane "Unhappy Meals". Environmentalists and Peta members don't think humans are worthy of anything, especially the right to liberty and their own lives. They want to teach our children that they have to join the rest of the world to save the earth because that is the only noble cause-their own freedom and personal lives are inconsequential!
 
 
Corruption Is Color Blind------
 
Charlie Rangel needs to get a grip! He's being investigated and he says it's because he is black. No, Charlie, it's because you're a cheat who happens to be the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, the man in charge of writing our tax laws! And since the Ethics Committee has begun their investigation of your dealings, you've given money to several members of that committee to boost their campaigns. You're not being scrutinized for criminal activity because you're black. It's because you're a crook-a crook with more gall than brains!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Transparent Self-Interest

Barack Obama ought to be pleased with Sen. Edward Kennedy right about now. Our President campaigned on a promise to have the most tranparent government ever. Ted Kennedy is showing himself to be quite the see-thru politician-albeit one definitely motivated by his own self-interest. He has petitioned the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to reverse the law that mandates a special election to replace vacated U.S. Senate seats.
 
Kennedy is battling brain cancer and is afraid that the necessity for him to leave office or his death would render the Senate short one seat and therefore susceptible to a Republican filibuster.  He has been Congress' staunchest, most active advocate for government-run healthcare. I'm sure he'd like to do all he can to make it happen. He wants a return to the original method of filling an empty Senate seat in his state-gubernatorial appointment.
 
His request for such a reversal of state law is in and of itself a way-too-obvious attempt to guarantee his party's dominance in the Senate. What sends it beyond obvious and into the realm of the despicable is the fact that during the Presidential campaign of 2004, Kennedy was the primary force behind that new state law requiring elections to replace vacated Senate seats in Massachusetts! When John Kerry was running against George W., Ted Kennedy didn't want Republican governor Mitt Romney to appoint a Republican replacement for Kerry if the Senator won the Presidency.
 
While I am sympathetic to the severe health issues Sen. Kennedy is facing, I hope the Democrat-controlled Commonwealth of Massachusetts does not bow to his self-motivated pressure. Such obvious pandering would do nothing for the position of the Democratic Party at a time when its poll numbers are sinking. Getting a healthcare reform bill through the Senate based on that kind of political manuevering wouldn't help liberals' case with the American people.
 
The long time Senator from Massachusetts sent a ball rolling down the hill four years ago and now wants to stop it before it hits home. Ted Kennedy's motivations couldn't possibly be more transparent. While our President and his utterly nontransparent administration should probably be thankful that at least one politician's true intent is indisputable so their campaign promise isn't a total lie, they should also be ashamed that the only one in government with the guts to show their real motivation is an aging, sickly member of a political dynasty with a forty-year-old issue ax to grind.
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Political Puppeteers

House Speaker Pelosi and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel recently met alone behind closed doors to discuss the health care reform bill. I don't know about you-but that scares me to death! Those two are possibly the most sinister of all the current crop of liberals running the show in Washington!
 
Obama may be too inexperienced to handle foreign policy, too out of his element with economic matters and possessing of a narcisstic personality that lends itself well to dictatorship, but the power dreams of other politicians like Pelosi and Emmanuel are definitely pulling strings behind the scenes.  The United States Congress is being manipulated like Punch and Judy dolls by a group of evil puppeteers.
 
 Pelosi trys to run the House like a prison warden, throwing her Republicans cohorts a few crumbs of legislation information then expecting them to sit captively in their cages while the Dems lay down the law as they think it should be. And Emmanuel? Well, when I heard that one Republican congressmen failed to show up for a pre-Cap n Trade vote gathering because he was afraid Emmanuel would grab his arm and throw him into a room with the President for further convincing, I knew the kind of man ol Rahm must be.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Say Anything As Long As I Agree With You

We've heard the liberal Dems ask in voices dripping with phony, heartfelt indignation- how can Conservatives complain about taxes at tea parties and post so many anti-Obama blogs? We're in a crisis situation- we're all in this together, they want to point out. We're all Americans, in the same economic boat, they say.  They tell us we need to stop complaining and be willing to make sacrifices as a country(read.....suffer higher taxes to join other nations in promulgating the notion of global warming).  They insist that we have to come together to survive this crisis and make America stronger.
 
The Dems tell us we are paranoid, they reassure us that our Bill of Rights is still intact- in their minds we are wasting valuable time whining about things like freedom of speech. They think we are the problem! They think we need to get onboard with all of their stupid ideas and bad legislation just to keep the peace! Keep the peace and lose our freedoms!  They really must think we're a bunch of uneducated idiots!  They think we're not paying attention. We won't notice that their notion of freedom of speech only applies to those with their ideology!
 
When we notice any First Amendment infraction or the threat of such an infraction, liberals go on the offensive with name-calling and fear mongering. They have to call us domestic terrorists and extremists because they cannot go on the defensive. They know in their hearts that there is no defense for trying to quell freedom of speech. If they focus the attention on domestic terrorists, striking a patriotic pose where they appear to honestly care about this country, then surely no one will notice what's going on. FYI, all you liberals, from mayors' houses to the White House-we are noticing-and keeping track of the instances we hear about where the First Amendment has been flagrantly ignored or called into question. I've put together this list of First Amendment problems which I've run across in the past six months:
 
*During the Atlanta Tax Day Tea Party on April 15, 2009, Atlanta police demanded that tea party protestors hand over the sticks from the backs of their signs because they represented 'possible weapons". One woman was even forced to hand over the metal pole holding up her American flag for the same reason. These were ordinary citizens-not ex-cons or rowdy kids. They were simply exercising their right to gather in the public to air their grievances. They should be able to do so without undue harrassment from law enforcement!
 
*This past April, students at a UNC-Chapel Hill seminar stormed the stage where Colorado Congressmen, Tom Tancredo. was giving a speech against illegal immigration. Police had to use pepper spray to subdue the protestors- angry students who thought they could use force against someone whose views differed from their own.
 
*Las Vegas, Nevada tea party organizers had to call their rally "picnic in the park' in order to obtain the required permit for public assembly. They were also slapped with a 1000 fee for the permit which a generous, sympathetic private citizen paid from his own pocket. Sounds like the city government of Las Vegas, with a financual roadblock and silly rules, was trying to make it a chore to get permission to have a tea party to protest the government.
 
*The Office of Homeland Security, under Janet Napalitano, is trying to discourage dissenting opinion and public rallies by calling their participants extremists and domestic terrorists. This kind of intimidation from our government against its citizens because they dare to be vocal with their opinions is too blatant to be believed! 
 
*During the height of the bank bailouts a few months ago, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry of Mass. suggested that the Senate set up a committee to help newspapers in danger of insolvency. Though he might have truly been thinking of helping out the press, which is an important part of our free republic, there is a problem with the idea: newspapers who receive a government bailout,by law, cannot endorse political candidates. Freedom of speech? Not so much!
 
*These same freedom of speech rights belong to those with liberal, non-conservative opinions as well! Richard Mullen, a middle school teacher from Brookeland Texas, who is an atheist and political liberal, is being railroaded by staunchly conservative school board members who all belong to the same church-a church whose pastor has publicly stated that there should only be Christian teachers in their public schools! If the school was private, they would be well within their rights to form school policy and create a religious learning institution. But, because we have a long-standing tradition of separating church and state, they are not within their rights to limit Mr. Mullen's freedom to express opinions vastly different from theirs in a government-funded school.
 
*Debbie McLucas, a hospital supervisor from Mansfield, Texas was told that a U.S. flag she had placed in her office was offensive to other workers, especially a woman from Africa who has only been in this country for 14 years. This woman took down McLucas' flag while McLucas was away. Her boss told her that the flag outside the building would have to be enough for her. McLucas was merely displaying her love and patriotism for her country-her homeland! Her husband and sons were once in the military and her daughter is currently serving in Iraq.
 
That last story had a happy ending because the story spread quickly across the Web and the hospital was inundated with phone callers expressing support for McLucas's right to have her flag. The hospital quickly reversed their decision and McLucas triumphed. Many voices for the cause of personal freedom and liberty do make a difference. We can't let any of these instances where people have been threatened and punished for having the nerve to speak up go unnoticed.
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our Country For A Horse

The Democrats in the United States House of Representatives are set to push their socialistic health care plan through Congress just as quickly as unsuspecting Americans will allow them to. Regardless of what they're all saying on television and radio and internet blogs, their ultimate goal is to turn this country's insurance system into a single-payer, universal health care plan completely under government control and offering no individual choice and nothing but the unspoken, hidden promise of substandard care.
 
Why isn't Congress pursuing other more obvious ways to provide insurance coverage for those lacking it? It would be much cheaper than 1 trillion dollars to directly attack the issue of covering only those who don't have it. And those numbers are more like 8 million than the 40 or 50 million the liberal pundits would have you believe. Why can't they just revamp the government insurance programs already on the boards? Why can't they figure out a way to overhaul Medicare and Medicaid? I also like Hermain Cain's seemingly workable idea of 2000-3000 thousand dollar vouchers to the uninsured(He is a Conservative spokesman, the founder of the Intelligent Thinker's Movement, a successful entrepreneur and Atlanta talk show host).
 
The answer to why the federal government isn't considering these other alternatives is that the health of its citizenry is not their primary concern. They are solely about building a bigger government. The liberals in Congress like so many liberals before them cloak their desire for power and control of the  government purse strings in supposedly humanitarian campaigns to save the world, save the seals, save some little fish in California, save us all from cigarette smoking and save us from the horrors of sugar. Unfortunately, too many Americans want to retreat to their childhood and do exactly as their nanny says!
  
This is all part of Barack Obama's oh-so-obvious plan to turn America into the United Socialist States- much like many European countries. He says it wants to create affordable insurance for everyone but what he really aims to do is make everything equal-to make sure no one has anything more than his neighbor. Oh, we're going to be on the leveled playing field from hell, allright, when we find ourselves waiting for months for life-saving cancer treatment. Mr. Obama has set the framework for a new Socialist country in a matter of only six months. Even I didn't think it would happen this fast!
 
He's already killing the free market system. Big companies aren't allowed to fail, banks are choking from over-regulation and small business incentives are going to drop substantially if not altogether. We had to know that after all the outright blatant takeovers that have happened in the last six months and from Democrats screaming that the economy required swift, decisive action, that they would climb on their liberal soapboxes and proclaim healthcare reform as another financial emergency.
 
But more than their soapboxes, they love their Trojan horses. They're like the Democratic family pets. They trot them out for the public to see. They've sent this latest one in under the guise of providing relief to the poor, bereft masses. The duped fools who put this arrogant, narcississtic charlatan of a president into office are going to be corralled right along with the rest of us into a pasture of mediocrity, a herd of serfs tended to by a benevolent landowner, the U.S. government.
 
Our only hope out of this healthcare reform debacle is that the Senate will fight this healthcare and realize that the money is just  not there unless they're willing to go out on a limb and anger a large majority of their constituents. The easiest source of this financial funding would be to lay more taxes on us citizens. The administration has to be wary of that ,however, because President Obama made campaign promises not to saddle the struggling middle class with any more taxes. But they'll find the money from somewhere-such as taxing those making over 250000 until their eyes bug out! After all, that Trojan horse is special to them. They'll pay anything to improve his appearance and to keep everyone from finding out that inside there's just an old mule, universal health care, that no matter how you dress him up, nobody really wants.
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hey,Garafaolo! Listen Up!

I'd like to introduce myself to Janeane Garafaolo. I am a proud, Libertarian/Conservative Southern white woman, born and bred in the great state of South Carolina, college -educated and leading a cosmopolitan lifestyle near Atlanta.  Garafaolo, you need to listen up! You have no business unilaterally labelling all tea party protestors as ignorant, racist rednecks.  I am  neither ignorant nor a racist but I proudly marched around the town square and congregated on the courthouse steps of an historic middle Georgia town on April 15th to protest my indignation at federal government actions and to lend my support to the fight to save the principles of our Founding Fathers.
 
FYI, tea party protestors came from across the board. They ranged from financiers and college professors to blue collar workers(who also have brains), stay at home moms and small entrepreneurs. These were people who have watched our government and come to their own intelligent conclusions. I guess it's just easier for liberals like you to assume that any opinion other than yours must be fueled by stupidity or bias, since, if they were fueled by other well-thought out reasons, then liberals might be....aghast....wrong! You use words like 'teabagging' to keep from actually using rational thought to consider what's happening among Conservatives.
 
As for the racism accusation, you don't need to look far in this country to find many black Conservative voices. In Madison,Georgia I stood alongside fellow Americans who were black and as fed up with the government as I am. My husband who attended a tea party in Sugarland, TX., said that several speakers on those city hall steps were black. Intelligent people come in all colors. 
 
I do not dislike our new President because he is black. Some years ago, I had a great respect for our military commander-in-chief, Gen. Colin Powell who I believed then would have made a good president. Last month, I joined the Intelligent Thinker's Movement, an organization founded by local Atlanta Conservative radio talk show host, Herman Cain, an uber-successful, black businessman whose daily wisdom and insight never fails to amaze and inspire me. I would vote for him for President in a heartbeat! No, I do not dislike our new President because he is a black man. He is just the 'wrong' black man.
 
You said that tax day protestors didn't know what the Boston Tea Party was about. Well, we know-the question is, Do You? It was about more than taxes-it was about ordinary citizens sick up and fed with a huge out-of-control government that threatens our freedoms. Sound familiar?
 
It seems to me that you are the one woefully uneducated. The Tea Party Movement wasn't started by incendiary diatribes from Conservative radio talk show hosts or wholly organized by rightist media or politicians. It is truly a grassroots movement that started with the shared opinions of many Americans that swept through the web and onto the streets. Last Wednesday was not a one-time evening of chest-pounding(as one liberal reporter described it). Websites abound with the same cause-the resurgence of Conservatism in America. More rallies are scheduled for later this year. You want to talk about 'straight up' facts? Well, here's one for you. The tea party protests that occurred on this last April 15th were plain tea, straight up. Now, it's time to add a little flavoring with the continuing fight against a liberal government that seeks to destroy our freedoms and rights.There will be more protests in the coming months to spice up that plain old tea!
 
Your comments seem to suggest another kind of bigotry- partisan bigotry. You think that only liberals know how to save this country. I'm sure I speak for my other tax day tea party protestor brethren when I say, We Don't Want the Kind of Country That You Want to Save!! If I seem to be getting irate this is why: you've heard the expression, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned? Well, an angry, strong, Southern woman, white or black, is much worse. Along with many of our Conservative-minded fellow citizens, we are mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.
 
 
Copyright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »